Question:
What extent does the law create boundaries between individual rights, and the wider national interests?
How can health care professionals, such as pharmacists prescribing advisers, balance their ethical obligations with the mandate to keep within government budgets or achieve priority targets?
Answer to Question: PHAR6778 Law In Pharmacy Practice
Regulations that regulate the pharmaceutical industry and the health sector are not without controversy.
The Pharmaceutical Journal’s 2007 most significant report focuses on cash problems reported by the National Health Service.
Sometimes, regulations dictate that certain services need to be paid for and others should be offered free of charge.
This is a problem because expensive drugs, such as Herceptin, are only available to select patients.
The laws serve to limit individualistic rights and protect the interests of the entire population.
It is usually the government that provides medical services to the public.
There are many criteria that a country may use, but the most notable is the determination of the need. (Steven and al. 2017, 721).
The determination of need is critical in determining whether or not a certain service should exist.
Given the growing need for medical attention, it is prudent that the government provide medical care to its citizens.
According to the journal the Labour government promised to provide medical services depending on their individual needs.
The poor state of the country’s health is due to the failure of leaders to keep their promises.
The creation of the National Health Service appeared to be a salvation for many, especially when it describes its duties.
The requirements of the mandate and what is written in the manifesto are not necessarily true.
This disillusionment caused staff members to lose their faith in managers and administrators, who then took responsibility for the government’s failures.
People are quick to blame medical facilities for their failures. Yet, policymakers and institutions can make laws without knowing the long-term consequences.
If you look closely at the National Health Service Act, you will see that an individual may be able to control an authority or institution, and create laws to govern them, but these laws can also have a negative impact upon the provision of services.
For instance, the Secretary-of-State for Health has been empowered with the responsibility of promoting the comprehensive health service sector.
The law has allowed for the legal rationing of health services in order to allow for comprehensive service provision.
The financing aspect is another thing to take into account.
The availability of adequate funding will enable institutions to operate. This will improve service delivery.
Accordingly, all health boards and primary healthcare trusts are required to operate within a set budget. (Nazar and al. (2018), 7106).
The National Health Service was formed to provide affordable services for people who don’t have access to healthcare.
This prevents inequalities in service provision.
This organization is mandated to provide technical assistance and expert evaluation, especially regarding the administration and treatment of certain drugs.
When ethical consideration is involved, it is essential to set priorities.
Al- Omran, 2018, 5, explains that there are instances when funds are used to provide medical services for cancer patients, while other issues are neglected.
This results in the question of which medical sectors are given priority.
This decision makes no sense.
It is often a question of debate whether blanket bans on certain drugs or policies solve problems and create solutions.
North Stoke Primary Care Trust stopped funding Herceptin, a drug that was required to treat breast carcinoma. This is a case in point.
This was despite the fact that the drug had not been licensed. But it could solve the problem.
This is where ethics plays a major role.
First, it is important to decide if lives are worth risking for the sake policies.
It is also important to consider whether it would be prudent for medical doctors to disregard these policies. (Middleton 2018 5).
Although money may have been saved to meet certain obligations, this does not guarantee that they will be used for the intended purpose.
The needs of people should be considered when determining whether funds are available to provide services.
While policies sometimes make it difficult to provide the services that people need, they can also delay their delivery (Jepson 2018 05).
Because certain medicines are not licensed, they may be prohibited.
The exorbitant price of essential drugs can also limit access to these medicines.
Pharmacists have the responsibility of protecting life and ensuring medical services are provided in a prudent way.
It is necessary to develop policies regarding medical costs regulation.
Allocating resources should be done in harmony with human values and ethical standards.
It is important to end rationing and other unfriendly policies so that everyone can have equal access (Salter & Micallef (2017) 12).
When it comes to distributing resources, morals should be considered.
Social strata and political affiliations can lead to certain groups of people being marginalized and segregated. This leads to inequitable distributions of resources.
The country will have equal medical resources if it adheres to the principles of pharmaceutical and medical ethics (Hajjar et. al. 2017, 2017).
Accordingly, policymakers should ensure that equality is experienced and seen so equal amounts are given to all.
An approach that considers rights as well should be used to fulfill the people’s requirements.
Finally, resources must be distributed according to the needs of the people.
This ensures people with more pressing needs will be provided services that are comparable to their needs.
By adhering to these guidelines, equal service delivery can be achieved and will meet the National Medical Service’s goals.
ReferencesSteven, K., Howden, S., Mires, G., Rowe, I., Lafferty, N., Arnold, A., & Strath, A. (2017).
Toward interprofessional training and education: A mapping of common outcomes for prequalifying health professional programs in Britain.
39(7), 744-744.Jepson, A., & Wickens, H. (2018). PJ Online
Piloting a new pharmacy internship assistance programme in Namibia.
Pharmacy Education, 18.Nazar, H., Lindsey, L., Fletcher, J., Todd, A., & Husband, A. (2018).
Training student pharmacists to do medication checking and prescription dispensing in a high-fidelity clinical setting.
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. Ajpe7106.Al-Omran, O., MacAdam, A., & Gard, P. (2018).
Factors that impact medication adherence in Saudi kids. Lung cancer, 15, 05.Middleton, H. (2018).
How to build a professional portfolio. Why you should. Lung cancer, 15, 05.Slater, N., & Micallef, R. (2017).
Aiming to increase student engagement in pharmacy law.
New Directions in Physical Sciences Teaching (12).Hajjar, R., Bassatne, A., Cheaito, M. A., El Dine, R. N., Traboulsy, S., Haddadin, F., … & Akl, E. A. (2017).
A qualitative study on the interaction of pharmacists, doctors and pharmaceutical representatives in middle-income countries.
PloS one 12, 9 (e0184662).