Make your essay plan into a research essay with all the references.

Your essay should contain:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
POLI2001 Ideas In Political Science
Just from $8/Page
Order Essay

Not included in the word count is your student number and name.

Your essay topic should be clearly stated on the first page.

An introduction paragraph that highlights the research question that your essay answers and why it’s important to ask. A summary of your overall argument.

At least three of the major arguments you make will draw on the resources that you have consulted.

A concluding paragraph is a paragraph or set of paragraphs that brings together all the arguments in your argument and provides an overall answer for the essay question.

Answer to Question: POLI2001 Ideas In Political Science

Everywhere you look, there are movements. These movements can be found in Latin America or Africa.

Many movements were started by ordinary citizens to achieve democracy.

This essay will discuss the major causes of the movement.

This debate has a thesis statement that asks, “Does movement aid in the revitalization of democracy?”

Haynes (2013) suggests that politics has largely become a business.

The business depends more on making large sums of cash than it does on harnessing the talents and loyalty of the people.

There have been many other factors that have led to the situation where people are forced to revolt to protect their rights.

The principle of democracy is to protect the people from oppression.

It should be the main concern of the government and ruling party to take into consideration the perspectives of the people, and then shape their ruling ways according to their rights.Discussion:

Park (2008) stated that social movements are open for all because they represent a collective effort of people to defeat oppression.

Social movements tend to be open-minded towards mass protests, where citizens are free to think and act towards the country or any political scenario.

People often come together to fight for the same cause.

Robteutscher (2006) argued that minority groups often suffer in a society.

The main reason for a country’s democracy movement is to restore the right and opportunity of its minority population.

Therefore, it is easy to see that the main purpose of the social movement to improve the quality of life for everyone is to reduce the power and authority of a country or society.

Wittes (2008) stated that social movements can also play a significant role in decision making.

There are many instances when citizens of a country protest against the oppressive nature the ruling authority.

Everyone wants their individual rights.

When things get too difficult and people can’t solve them, they rebel against oppressive systems and begin fighting for democracy.

People can share their viewpoints and opinions with the help social movements (Robteutscher 2005).

It should be understood that decisions about what is right for the citizens of a country are made by the government.

The government might make a decision that is not in line with the views of the people.

Smith (2008) pointed out that every society is made up of an intellectual group who are there for the collective decision making process.

They determine what is the best or worst for the citizens of the country.

The process does not determine the outcome of discussion or arguments.


The government often comes up with a decision that does not align with common citizen decisions (Polletta 2012.

An intellectual group of people couldn’t be satisfied with such a decision, and so they reacted to it and began to fight for their rights.

This revolution is nothing but movements which ultimately leads to the wage of war against democratic values.

Robteutscher (2006) revealed that every nation has had its share of revolutions and struggles that were necessary to fulfill their rights.

Robteutscher (2006) stated that while the history hasn’t ended the revolutionary movement of citizens fighting for their own rights, there are still evidences to support that claim.

Polletta (2012) explains how people protested against Donald Trump being sworn in as President.

This can be said that although Donald Trump is now the President of the US, it was only possible because of the people. There were many who didn’t like the People’s decision.

It was evident that all were involved and it was a clear case of fighting for democracy today.

Park (2008) points out that movements will not improve the quality democracy in a nation.

Movements can often lead to the repeal of policies already in place.

People who lead the movement seek to improve the current situation by coming up with new ideas.

Park (2008) said that the new ideas and changes that will be offered by people involved in movements might not be suitable for a country.

Isin (2013) pointed out that policies that are designed for a specific country must be set up in a complex manner. They can only be built after taking into consideration all possible situations and the results of those policies.

Isin (2013) pointed out that the country’s leaders must consider all aspects of the decision-making process.

Leaders not only have to look after their country but also those of other countries.

It is because of this reason that the decisions made by the country’s government must be followed by its citizens and should not be challenged.

Haynes (2013) suggests that government decisions are sometimes made without considering the situation of the country.

The people must suffer. That is when they will rise up against the oppressing conditions.

In Libya, citizens need to take to the streets in protest of Gaddafi’s oppressive regime.

People could not face the oppressive nature and had to start thinking about how they can fight the situation.

Everyone is able to see the result and can live a better existence than before.

This was the essence of revolution.

This is necessary to revitalize democracy in a country.

It is important that people feel confident and capable of fighting for their rights.

Not all revolutions in the state democracy result in the removal of the government. Sometimes, however, people may revolt to gain what they are denied.

Revolutions in major industrialized countries have resulted from issues of inequality in gender, race, or religion.

There is inequal pay between men, women and women in America (Goodwin 2009).

This is a common, long-awaited discussion that can be considered a form of revolution against ongoing laws and policies in the country.

Even though there are no immediate changes to the existing policies of the government, it is important that government consider the well-being of the citizens and their views.

Della Porta, 2009 stated that democracy means equal rights for all citizens.

But sometimes, the government does not meet the expectations of the citizens and this can lead to cases where it isn’t evident in all cases.

This is when people begin to demand their rights.

To make sure that all sections of society are helped, the government must consider their needs and not just a few.

Blaug & Schwarzmantel (2016) present a crucial perspective on the revolutionary activities that are conducted in the name equality of rights and opportunities for all citizens.

Blaug & Schwarzmantel (2016) state that revolutions usually result in better communication among citizens.

It’s when people raise a protest mass. This happens because of good communication between members of the society.

To make sure that government considers the demands of those who have reached them, the message must be understood.

This is possible only if enough people join the movement to fight for the same cause (Carr 2007.

This happens when a large number of people unite to accomplish a common goal. It is known as a Mass Movement.

If we consider the current condition, it must be noted that the advent and use of social networking sites such Facebook and Twitter has made communication easier and allowed people to share their beliefs and thoughts.

When people are able to share their thoughts and believe with others, they find it easier to unite against oppression.

Because of technological and communication advances, people now have greater opportunities to resist any oppression.

Although mass movements are not new in modern times, they have certainly taken on new forms in recent years.Conclusion:

The detailed discussion about the importance of democracy, as well as how democratic citizens can protest against the oppressive nature of the ruling party, has made it clear that democracy is truly for people by people.

The benefits and rights of citizens should be the main focus of any government approach. This is not to be confused with the Global agenda.

It is evident that the country’s ruling power is responsible for all major aspects of the governmental/ruling perspective. But what should really matter is the welfare of the citizens.

Democracy has given people the freedom to decide whether the current situation is healthy enough for them to protest against it and fight to have their rights respected.

There is no doubt about the increasing power of the people. In recent years, it has been easier for the people to share their agenda with the government or the ruling parties.References:

Blaug R. & Schwarzmantel J. eds., 2016. Democracy: A reader.

Columbia University Press.Carr, P., 2007.

“Experiencing democracy through Neoliberalism: Social justice and democratic education.”

Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies. 5(2). pp. 1-20.Castells, M., 2015.

Networks for outrage and hope: Social movements of the Internet age.

London: John Wiley & Sons.

De Sousa Santos B., and Rodriguez Garavito C.A. eds., 2005.

The Law and Globalization From Below: A Path to a Cosmopolitan Law.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Della Porta, D., 2009.

Democracy and social movement.

New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Du Bois, W.E.B., 2013.

Black Reconstruction, America: Towards a History Of The Part That Black Folk Played In the Attempt To Reconstruct Democracy in America 1860-1880.

Transaction Publishers.Goodwin, J., Jasper, J.M.

Polletta F. eds., 2009.

Passionate politics. Social movements and emotions.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Guilhot, N., 2005.

The democracy makers: Human right and international order.

New York, Columbia University Press.Haynes, J., 2013.

Democracy and civil Society in the Third World. Politics and New Political Movements.

London: John Wiley & Sons.Isin, E.F., 2013.

Democracy, citizenship and the global metropolis. London: Routledge.Park, M., 2008.

Democracy and social changes: A history South Korean student movements from 1980 to 2000.

Bern: Peter Lang.Polletta, F., 2012.

Freedom is an endless encounter: Democracy in American social movements.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Robteutscher, S., 2005.

Democracy and the Role and Organizations of Associations: Social, political and organizational contexts.

Psychology Press.Smith, J., 2008.

Social movements for global democracies. Baltimore: JHU Press.Wittes, T.C., 2008.

There are three kinds of movements.

Journal of Democracy (19(3)), pp.7-12.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *